The competition is getting fierce.
We need to combine forces to beat them.
We're running four small campaigns, and we have ten operators between Southern Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast. Bumpertech and Pro Auto Repairs are eating our lunch. They spend roughly three times what we do and run it as one budget across the whole market. Same twenty bucks a day from each of us, in one campaign, and we're in the fight. If we don't, we stay third.
National Office has already invested heavily in website optimisation, SEO and AI search visibility to capture the maximum number of leads organically. Paid search is the one lever still being pulled ten different ways.
Impression share is the share of Google searches where our ad actually appeared, out of every search it was eligible to appear in. Bumpertech shows up in roughly half of them. We show up in fewer than one in five.
Brisbane search impression share — bumper, scratch, paint & minor repair terms
We appeared in about eighteen. The other eighty-two went to someone else.
We're not being beaten on ad quality or relevance. We're being beaten on presence. Presence is a budget problem, and budget problems have solutions. Quality problems take years.
The customers are already searching. The ads work when they run. We are simply not in the auction often enough — and that is the one thing on this page we can fix this month.
Nobody publishes their ad spend, so this is an estimate — but it's an estimate built on our own account data, not a guess. Impression share is measured against our eligible auctions: the same searches, the same keywords, the same clicks, the same going rate. If Bumpertech is appearing in 50.6% of the auctions we're eligible for and we're appearing in 17.7%, they're buying roughly 2.9 times what we are.
Estimated Brisbane search spend, indexed to Touch Up Guys = 1.0×. Derived from measured impression share, assuming comparable click-through and cost-per-click across advertisers bidding the same terms.
Bumpertech points one budget at the whole market. We point four small ones at four corners of it, and nothing at the other nine.
| Paid search | Bumpertech | Touch Up Guys |
|---|---|---|
| Budgets running | One, centralised | Four, separate |
| Territories with paid coverage | Whole market | 4 of 13 |
| Territories with zero paid presence | — | 9 |
| Conversion data feeding the bidding | One pool | Split four ways |
| Search impression share | 50.6% | 17.7% |
Competitor structure per network observation of their Brisbane campaigns; impression share measured in Google Ads.
A quiet Tuesday in one territory leaves money unspent while a busy territory next door is capped and skipping auctions. Separate budgets can't move. One budget goes wherever the demand is that day — which is the entire reason Bumpertech's money works harder than ours does.
Google's bidding learns from conversion data. Four small campaigns each learn from a quarter of the leads, so every one of them bids worse than a single campaign with all of it would. We're not just outspent — our spend is also working at a discount.
The estimate assumes we all pay about the same per click. In practice Bumpertech ranks above us in 74.5% of the auctions we both enter, and higher positions cost more. Their real spend is likely above 2.9×, not below it.
This is the part that's easy to get wrong. A campaign short on budget doesn't go dark at 1pm — Google paces it across the whole day and simply enters fewer auctions in every hour.
So there's no dramatic cliff to point at. We're quietly absent from most searches, all day, every day. That's what being outspent actually looks like in an ads account.
More budget doesn't extend our day. It thickens it.
Demand holds almost flat from 9am to 4pm, then tapers into the evening. There is no hour on this curve where we're winning our share. We're outspent across all fifteen of them.
Source: Google Ads, Brisbane campaigns, impressions by start hour. 109,041 impressions total. Zero impressions 22:00–06:59 reflects the current ad schedule, not budget.
Every territory in the cohort contributes the same $20 a day into a single coordinated campaign. Individually, $20 a day is pocket change that buys a handful of clicks. Thirteen of them, pooled, is real buying power across the whole market.
Where each territory sits today
One green. Three yellow. Nine red. That's the whole problem on one line — and it's also why we're third.
If you're already advertising, this is not extra money. It's a budget adjustment, not an addition to your current ad spend. Your existing campaign spend moves into the coordinated campaign — you're redirecting what you already spend, not writing a second cheque. If you're not currently advertising, this is your entry point at the same rate as everyone else.
| Contribution | Daily | Monthly (approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| Per participating territory | $20 | $600 |
| Thirteen participating territories | $260 | $7,800 |
| Coordinated SEQ campaign | $260 / day | ~$7,800 / month |
Figures are media spend. Campaign build, management and reporting handled centrally.
Nothing changes about who gets the job. The existing postcode lead-distribution system keeps allocating every enquiry to the correct operator, exactly as it does today. The only thing that changes is that the ad is still running at 4pm.
Coverage — participating service areas
Already advertising? You're not adding a cost — you're moving your existing spend somewhere it works harder. Not advertising? You get a coordinated campaign without ever opening a Google Ads account.
Bumpertech and Pro Auto Repairs run large, centralised Brisbane campaigns. A handful of operators with small local budgets can't compete with that individually — and one pooled campaign won't overtake them overnight either. That's not the objective.
The objective is to substantially increase our presence, get the four dark territories onto the board, and recover the searches we're currently conceding because we're outspent in every auction. Not a handful of small advertisers. One Brisbane Touch Up Guys network.
Reviewed at three months. Continue, expand, adjust or stop — on the numbers, not on vibes.
Nobody needs another invoice to chase or another login to remember. We can set up an automatic card charge — daily or weekly, whichever suits you — so your contribution goes straight into the campaign and you never think about it again.
Reply to the thread. That's the whole commitment for now.
Card on file, charged daily or weekly at $20 a day. Cancel any time — it's a pilot, not a contract.
National Office builds and runs the campaign. Leads land through the postcode system exactly as they do today.
Already advertising? Remember this is a budget adjustment — you're moving your current spend across, not stacking a new one on top of it.
Then you're not in it. Nobody is being forced, and nobody's territory is being taken off them. But it's worth being straight about what it means, because it isn't the same answer for everybody.
Practically, not much changes for you day to day. You keep your area and your leads. You just won't be supporting the network that's carrying the brand you trade under — and the brand strength you rely on is being paid for by the operators who did put their hand up.
This is the part to think hard about. The coordinated campaign will be the prominent Touch Up Guys ad in those searches, and those leads route to the operators funding it.
You won't lose your existing work. But the new enquiries the group's money generates will go to the group, and you'll be watching them go past. You've got to spend money to make money.
Forget the impression share for a minute. Here's the only arithmetic that matters, using our own numbers: an enquiry costs us somewhere between $3 and $7. About 40% of enquiries turn into a job. The average job is around $660.
| Working it through | Best case | Worst case |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of one enquiry | $3 | $7 |
| Enquiries needed to win one job (40%) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Advertising cost to win one job | $7.50 | $17.50 |
| Value of that job | $660 | $660 |
| Advertising as a share of the job | 1.1% | 2.7% |
Your contribution is $600 a month. One average job is $660. One job a month and you're square — everything after that is yours. The question isn't whether $20 a day is worth it. The question is whether you back yourself to win one extra job a month out of a campaign three times the size of the one you've got now.
Nobody can promise a number, so here's the model with the dial turned against us. The combined pool is $7,800 a month. The only real unknown is what an enquiry costs us in a bigger, better-funded campaign — so we've run it at our current figure, and then at three, four and seven times worse.
| Cost per enquiry | Enquiries / mo | Jobs / mo | Network revenue | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $7 — our current figure | 1,114 | 446 | $294,000 | 37× |
| $15 — twice as expensive | 520 | 208 | $137,000 | 17× |
| $30 — four times as expensive | 260 | 104 | $68,600 | 8.8× |
| $50 — seven times as expensive | 156 | 62 | $41,200 | 5.3× |
That's the whole case, and it doesn't rely on the good number. Even if enquiries end up costing us seven times what they cost today, the campaign still returns better than five dollars for every one we put in. On the realistic middle of that table, we're looking at roughly 5 to 8 extra jobs per territory, per month — for $600.
Projection, not a guarantee. Assumes 40% enquiry-to-job conversion and a $660 average job at current network rates. Jobs will not split evenly — territories with higher search volume will see more of them, which is exactly how the postcode system already works. Job value is revenue, not margin: apply your own costs and labour.
Nobody is being told what to do with their own money, and nobody's territory is at risk. But this really is the only way we compete against these guys. They've got one budget and one plan. We've got thirteen territories, four small campaigns and a lot of good intentions. That fight only goes one way, and it's the way it's going now.
$20 a day. Three months. Full transparency on where every dollar goes, reviewed fortnightly, reported monthly. If it doesn't work, we stop and we've all learned something cheaply.
Together we are one.
Apart we are lost.
Reply to this thread with a yes or a no. If you're a no, tell me why — if the reason is fixable, I'd rather fix it than lose the coverage.